问题: 翻译求助
Consumers are being confused and misled by the hodge-podge (大杂烩) of environmental claims made by household products, according to a “green labeling” study published by Consumers International Friday .Among the report’s more outrageous (令人无法容忍的) findings-a German fertilizer described itself as “ earthworm friendly” a brand of flour said it was “non-polluting” and a British toilet paper claimed to be “environmentally friendlier”The study was written and researched by Britain’s National Consumer Council (NCC) for lobby group Consumer International. It was funded by the German and Dutch governments and the European Commission.“ While many good and useful claims are being made , it is clear there is a long way to go in ensuring shoppers are adequately informed about the environmental impact of products they buy,” said Consumers International director Anna Fielder .The 10-country study surveyed product packaging in Britain. Western Europe, Scandinavia and the United States. It found that products sold in Germany and the United Kingdom made the most environmental claims on average. The report focused on claims made by specific
解答:
消费者是迷茫和误引由大杂烩(大杂烩家庭产品提出的)环境要求,根据Consumers ・出版的“green labeling”研究International星期五。在report’s更加粗暴的(令人无法容忍的)研究结果之中德国肥料自我描述, “蚯蚓面粉品牌说的friendly”它是“non-polluting”,并且声称的英国卫生纸是“environmentally friendlier”The研究由Britain’s全国消费者理事会(NCC)写并且研究大厅小组消费者国际性组织。 它由德语资助,并且荷兰政府和欧洲Commission.“,当许多好和有用的要求提出时,是确切有在保证他们买的顾客的一段路要走充分地被通知关于产品的环境影响, ”说消费者国际安娜主任守场员。10国家研究勘测了包装在英国的产品。 西欧、斯堪的那维亚和美国。 它发现产品在德国卖了,并且英国平均提出最环境的要求。 报告集中于具体提出的要求
版权及免责声明
1、欢迎转载本网原创文章,转载敬请注明出处:侨谊留学(www.goesnet.org);
2、本网转载媒体稿件旨在传播更多有益信息,并不代表同意该观点,本网不承担稿件侵权行为的连带责任;
3、在本网博客/论坛发表言论者,文责自负。